Why teams buy CRMs for a single feature and regret it I've been there: a demo shows a beautiful inbox sync, an AI note-taker, or a dashboard that looks like it understands your pipeline
Composable commerce promises modularity: pick best-of-breed services, swap components, and assemble a tailored stack. In practice many teams end up tangled in proprietary dependencies inside those same services
Comment 1: Look, we worked with Netguru on a composable commerce roll-out last year. Here’s the thing: their dev team nailed the decoupling aspect and helped reduce frontend/backend dependency, which was great
Dan was a partner at a private equity firm managing roughly $750 million in assets under management. They had been operating off spreadsheets, a shared inbox, and a handful of stubbornly inconsistent notes for years
1. Why short-term finance so often wrecks deals: the payment shock explained Payment shock hits when you borrow fast and the headline numbers mask the real outlay
Lingual tonsil hypertrophy and tongue base collapse are common obstruction sites identified by drug-induced sleep endoscopy to guide targeted surgeries.
5 Critical Questions About Choosing a CRM Most Teams Ignore Before you sign a contract or demo a flashy feature, ask the right questions
Why these seven integration governance moves matter for mid-market composable commerce projects Executives at $50M to $500M companies often hear confident vendor pitches about composable commerce: swap the monolith, gain agility, scale
Discover Covent Garden’s side road performers, wherein illusions and sleight-of-hand nod to wizardry, delighting fanatics young and old in London.
Sit down, coffee in hand, and let’s talk plainly about loan-to-value (LTV) and why it is the single clearest pricing lever in property finance. I’ll use real client-style examples and pound figures so you can see the math